Watch the video to learn more about these features:
As per the NICE guidelines, it is suggested that HDF may have mortality benefits compared to standard HD and is cost-effective.15
HDF considered as cost effective to HD
Reduced EPO requirements of up to 9 %14 with HDF based on weighted average calculation
Economic benefits for units using Fresenius Medical Care equipment as no switching costs from HD to HDF (including higher convection volumes), which means neutral budget impact
Fewer side effects for HDF compared to high-flux HD14
The NICE committee indicated additional benefit of HDF over high flux HD, the potential reduction in dialysis-related amyloidosis in patients on long term dialysis
Convection volume
The NICE committee did not make any specific recommendation, but agreed that it was likely that patients who achieved higher convection volumes would get a greater benefit from HDF
* Cost should always be considered in the context of relevant local healthcare systems.
In particular during high-volume HDF where high blood flows are aspired for, monitoring of the venous access is essential as blood loss would become critical within a very short time. The 5008 series and 6008 CAREsystem offer a sophisticated safety feature as standard in all machines that has been designed to reduce the risk of external blood loss:
The innovative and highly automated features support nursing staff by streamlining daily workflows and support high and consistent levels of patient safety. The result is easy integration of high-volume HDF into daily routine.
Maintenance hemodialysis patients often experience increased protein catabolism, amino acid and albumin loss during dialysis, which contributes to malnutrition.
According to a study by Ehlerding et al., the albumin loss with FX CorAL was less than 1.4 g during a typical HDF treatment of four hours.6
In another study by Melchior et al., FX CorAL was found to have the lowest albumin sieving coefficient decrease over time compared to other seven dialyzers.
Dialyzers investigated in this study: FX CorAL 600 / 80 (Fresenius Medical Care); FX CorDiax 600 / 80 (Fresenius Medical Care); xevontaHi 15 / 20 (B. Braun); Polyflux 140 H /170 H (Baxter); ELISIO™-15H /19H (Nipro); FDX-150GW / 210GW (Nikkiso Medical); THERANOVA 400 (Baxter); SUREFLUX™-15UX /19UX (Nipro).
Clinical evidence shows better removal rates of β2-microglobulin and myoglobulin for FX CorAL compared to reference dialyzers during four hour high-voume HDF treatment.6
Study subgroup analysis showed an inverse relationship between convection volume and risk of mortality.8,24 According Basile et al., the recommended convection volume is the maximum possible, of at least 23 L. It is proposed that a convection volume of at least 23 L (for 1.73m2 body surface area) is suggested to enhance the clinical outcomes of HDF therapy. 25
Learn more about FX CorAL
1 https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng107, Renal replacement therapy and conservative management, published date: October 2018.
* All statements and assessments by NICE are based on care practice and costs in England.
3 Internal calculation is based on an example at QB = 300 mL/min and a 240-minute treatment. There are savings of 34 L of dialysis fluid with post HDF at AutoFlow factor 1.2, with QD = 360 mL/min, compared to post HDF, with a fixed QD = 500 mL/min.
4 Marcelli, D. et al., High-Volume Postdilution Hemodiafiltration Is a Feasible Option in Routine Clinical Practice, Artificial Organs 2015, 39(2): 142–149.
5 Moustapha et al, (2020) Manual Individualization of the Dialysate Flow According to Blood Flow: Effects on the Hemodialysis Dose Delivered and on Dialysate Consumption. J Kidney 6:181. doi-10.35248/2472-1220.20.6.181.
6 Ehlerding, G. et al., Randomized comparison of three high-flux dialyzers during high volume online hemodiafiltration – the comPERFORM study, Clin Kidney J 2021 Oct 5;15(4):672-680. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfab196
7 Krick G, Ronco C (eds): On- Line Hemodiafiltration: The Journey and the Vision. Contrib Nephrol. Basel, Karger, 2011, vol 175, pp 170–185.
8 Maduell F. et al., High-efficiency postdilution online hemodiafiltration reduces all-cause mortality in hemodialysis patients, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (2013); 24: 487-497.
10 Pedrini, L. et al., Long-term effects of high-efficiency on-line haemodiafiltration on uraemic toxicity. A multicentre prospective randomized study, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation (2011); 26: 2617-2624.
11 Ok E., et al., Mortality and cardiovascular events in online haemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) compared with high-flux dialysis: results from the Turkish OL-HDF Study, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation (2013); 28: 192-202.
12 Hornig C. et al., Switching from high-flux dialysis to hemodiafiltration: Cost-consequences for patients, providers, and payers. Semin Dial. 2022
14 NICE, Renal replacement therapy and conservative management; NICE guideline. 2018: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng107/chapter/Recommendations#.
15 NICE, RRT and conservative management; Cost-effectiveness analysis: HDF versus high flux HD. 2018: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng107/evidence/costeffectiveness-
16 NICE, RRT and conservative management; Modalities of RRT. 2018: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng107/evidence/b-modalities-of-rrt-pdf-6542344047.
17 Canaud, B. et al., Hemodiafiltration to Address Unmet Medical Needs ESKD Patients, Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 13: 1435–1443, 2018.
18 Maduel, F. et al., Impact of the 5008 monitor software update on total convective volume, Nefrologia (English Version) 2014; 34: 599–604.
19 Imamović G. et al., Principles of Haemodiafiltration: Rationale for Improved Patients’ Survival. Advances in Hemodiafiltration. InTech; 2016, Chapter 2. dx.doi.org/10.5772/63067
20 Marcelli, D. et al., Modifiable factors associated with achievement of high-volume post-dilution hemodiafiltration: results from an international study, Int J Artif Organs 2015; 38 (5): 244–250.
21 Ying I, Levitt Z, Jassal SV. Should an elderly patient with stage V CKD and dementia be started on dialysis? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 May;9(5):971-7. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05870513.
22 Lang T. et.al., Hemodiafiltration: Technical and Medical Insights. Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Jan 21;10(2):145.
23 Melchior, P. et al., Complement activation by dialysis membranes and its association with secondary membrane formation and surface charge. Artif Organs 2021 Jul;45(7):770-778 https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.13887
24 Peters et al., Haemodiafiltration and mortality in end-stage kidney disease patients: a pooled individual participant data analysis from four randomized controlled trials Nephrol Dial Transplant (2016) 31: 978–984
25 Basile, C. et al., Why choose high volume online post-dilution hemodiafiltration? J Nephrol 30, 181–186 (2017).
26 FX CorDiaxHDF, Haemodiafilter Instructions for Use.
27 FX CorDiax, High-Flux Dialysers. Instructions for Use.
28 Penne et al., Short-term effects of online hemodiafiltration on phosphate control: a result from the randomized controlled Convective Transport Study (CONTRAST) Am J Kidney Dis 2010 Jan;55(1):77-87.