Watch the video to learn more about these features:
As per the NICE guidelines, it is suggested that HDF may have mortality benefits compared to standard HD and is cost-effective.15
HDF considered as cost effective to HD
Reduced EPO requirements of up to 9 %14 with HDF based on weighted average calculation
Economic benefits for units using Fresenius Medical Care equipment as no switching costs from HD to HDF (including higher convection volumes), which means neutral budget impact
Fewer side effects for HDF compared to high-flux HD14
The NICE committee indicated additional benefit of HDF over high flux HD, the potential reduction in dialysis-related amyloidosis in patients on long term dialysis
Convection volume
The NICE committee did not make any specific recommendation, but agreed that it was likely that patients who achieved higher convection volumes would get a greater benefit from HDF
* Cost should always be considered in the context of relevant local healthcare systems.
What if dialysis machines could feel the position of the venous needle?
Our answer
In particular during high-volume HDF where high blood flows are aspired for, monitoring of the venous access is essential as blood loss would become critical within a very short time. The 5008 series and 6008 CAREsystem offer a sophisticated safety feature as standard in all machines that has been designed to reduce the risk of external blood loss:
The innovative and highly automated features support nursing staff by streamlining daily workflows and support high and consistent levels of patient safety. The result is easy integration of high-volume HDF into daily routine.
Maintenance hemodialysis patients often experience increased protein catabolism, amino acid and albumin loss during dialysis, which contributes to malnutrition.
According to a study by Ehlerding et al., the albumin loss with FX CorAL was less than 1.4 g during a typical HDF treatment of four hours.6
In another study by Melchior et al., FX CorAL was found to have the lowest albumin sieving coefficient decrease over time compared to other seven dialyzers.
Dialyzers investigated in this study: FX CorAL 600 / 80 (Fresenius Medical Care); FX CorDiax 600 / 80 (Fresenius Medical Care); xevontaHi 15 / 20 (B. Braun); Polyflux 140 H /170 H (Baxter); ELISIO™-15H /19H (Nipro); FDX-150GW / 210GW (Nikkiso Medical); THERANOVA 400 (Baxter); SUREFLUX™-15UX /19UX (Nipro).
Clinical evidence shows better removal rates of β2-microglobulin and myoglobulin for FX CorAL compared to reference dialyzers during four hour high-voume HDF treatment.6
Study subgroup analysis showed an inverse relationship between convection volume and risk of mortality.8,24 According Basile et al., the recommended convection volume is the maximum possible, of at least 23 L. It is proposed that a convection volume of at least 23 L (for 1.73m2 body surface area) is suggested to enhance the clinical outcomes of HDF therapy. 25
Learn more about FX CorAL